Box 83
Contains 14 Results:
Various court documents
Case against the South Carolina Election Commission in which plaintiff’s state their federal constitutional right to vote for Charles Ravenel, Democratic nominee for Governor of South Carolina, was abridged due to the enforcement of an article in the South Carolina Constitution, which placed a residency requirement upon nominees from the state of South Carolina. The case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court, under the October term of 1974.
Application for stay
Case against the South Carolina Election Commission in which plaintiff’s state their federal constitutional right to vote for Charles Ravenel, Democratic nominee for Governor of South Carolina, was abridged due to the enforcement of an article in the South Carolina Constitution, which placed a residency requirement upon nominees from the state of South Carolina. The case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court, under the October term of 1974.
Various complaints
Case against the South Carolina Election Commission in which plaintiff’s state their federal constitutional right to vote for Charles Ravenel, Democratic nominee for Governor of South Carolina, was abridged due to the enforcement of an article in the South Carolina Constitution, which placed a residency requirement upon nominees from the state of South Carolina. The case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court, under the October term of 1974.
Various briefs
Case against the South Carolina Election Commission in which plaintiff’s state their federal constitutional right to vote for Charles Ravenel, Democratic nominee for Governor of South Carolina, was abridged due to the enforcement of an article in the South Carolina Constitution, which placed a residency requirement upon nominees from the state of South Carolina. The case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court, under the October term of 1974.
Various orders
Case against the South Carolina Election Commission in which plaintiff’s state their federal constitutional right to vote for Charles Ravenel, Democratic nominee for Governor of South Carolina, was abridged due to the enforcement of an article in the South Carolina Constitution, which placed a residency requirement upon nominees from the state of South Carolina. The case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court, under the October term of 1974.
Various statements
Case against the South Carolina Election Commission in which plaintiff’s state their federal constitutional right to vote for Charles Ravenel, Democratic nominee for Governor of South Carolina, was abridged due to the enforcement of an article in the South Carolina Constitution, which placed a residency requirement upon nominees from the state of South Carolina. The case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court, under the October term of 1974.
Designation of a Three-Judge Court
Case against the South Carolina Election Commission in which plaintiff’s state their federal constitutional right to vote for Charles Ravenel, Democratic nominee for Governor of South Carolina, was abridged due to the enforcement of an article in the South Carolina Constitution, which placed a residency requirement upon nominees from the state of South Carolina. The case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court, under the October term of 1974.
Various memorandums
Case against the South Carolina Election Commission in which plaintiff’s state their federal constitutional right to vote for Charles Ravenel, Democratic nominee for Governor of South Carolina, was abridged due to the enforcement of an article in the South Carolina Constitution, which placed a residency requirement upon nominees from the state of South Carolina. The case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court, under the October term of 1974.
Answers
Case against the South Carolina Election Commission in which plaintiff’s state their federal constitutional right to vote for Charles Ravenel, Democratic nominee for Governor of South Carolina, was abridged due to the enforcement of an article in the South Carolina Constitution, which placed a residency requirement upon nominees from the state of South Carolina. The case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court, under the October term of 1974.
Response
Case against the South Carolina Election Commission in which plaintiff’s state their federal constitutional right to vote for Charles Ravenel, Democratic nominee for Governor of South Carolina, was abridged due to the enforcement of an article in the South Carolina Constitution, which placed a residency requirement upon nominees from the state of South Carolina. The case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court, under the October term of 1974.