Skip to main content

Box 96

 Container

Contains 5 Results:

Correspondence, court, and related documents

 File — Box: 96, Folder: 1
Identifier: Folder 1
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Case in which plaintiffs claim the reapportioning of the South Carolina Senate to be unconstitutional, based on further claim that the votes of African Americans have been diluted by the measure.

Dates: 1983
Found in: Avery Research Center for African American History and Culture / Armand Derfner legal papers / 26. Matthew D. McCollum v. John C. West. C.A. No. 71-1211; Maggie H. Twiggs v. John C. West, et al. C.A. No. 71-1106; Daniel R. McLeod v. John West et al. C.A. No. 71-1123

Legal and related documents

 File — Box: 96, Folder: 2
Identifier: Folder 2
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Case in which plaintiffs claim the reapportioning of the South Carolina Senate to be unconstitutional, based on further claim that the votes of African Americans have been diluted by the measure.

Dates: 1983
Found in: Avery Research Center for African American History and Culture / Armand Derfner legal papers / 26. Matthew D. McCollum v. John C. West. C.A. No. 71-1211; Maggie H. Twiggs v. John C. West, et al. C.A. No. 71-1106; Daniel R. McLeod v. John West et al. C.A. No. 71-1123

Case-related articles

 File — Box: 96, Folder: 3
Identifier: Folder 3
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Case in which plaintiffs claim the reapportioning of the South Carolina Senate to be unconstitutional, based on further claim that the votes of African Americans have been diluted by the measure.

Dates: 1983
Found in: Avery Research Center for African American History and Culture / Armand Derfner legal papers / 26. Matthew D. McCollum v. John C. West. C.A. No. 71-1211; Maggie H. Twiggs v. John C. West, et al. C.A. No. 71-1106; Daniel R. McLeod v. John West et al. C.A. No. 71-1123

Case-related documents

 File — Box: 96, Folder: 4
Identifier: Folder 4
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Case in which plaintiffs claim the reapportioning of the South Carolina Senate to be unconstitutional, based on further claim that the votes of African Americans have been diluted by the measure.

Dates: 1983
Found in: Avery Research Center for African American History and Culture / Armand Derfner legal papers / 26. Matthew D. McCollum v. John C. West. C.A. No. 71-1211; Maggie H. Twiggs v. John C. West, et al. C.A. No. 71-1106; Daniel R. McLeod v. John West et al. C.A. No. 71-1123

Various court documents

 File — Box: 96, Folder: 5-6
Identifier: Folder 5-6
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Case in which plaintiffs claim the reapportioning of the South Carolina Senate to be unconstitutional, based on further claim that the votes of African Americans have been diluted by the measure.

Dates: 1983
Found in: Avery Research Center for African American History and Culture / Armand Derfner legal papers / 26. Matthew D. McCollum v. John C. West. C.A. No. 71-1211; Maggie H. Twiggs v. John C. West, et al. C.A. No. 71-1106; Daniel R. McLeod v. John West et al. C.A. No. 71-1123
For more information about our repositories and answers to frequently asked questions, please visit the help page here.