Skip to main content

Box 39

 Container

Contains 7 Results:

Correspondence and related documents

 File — Box: 39, Folder: 1
Identifier: Folder 1
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Testimonies: Benjamin Brockington; Ethel Grimball; Lewis Waring; James Fields

 File — Box: 39, Folder: 2
Identifier: Folder 2
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Moultrie District II school board minutes: 1953-1960; 1967-1974

 File — Box: 39, Folder: 3-4
Identifier: Folder 3-4
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Letters for request of racial breakdown

 File — Box: 39, Folder: 5
Identifier: Folder 5
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

St. James-Santee District 1 school board minutes: 1973

 File — Box: 39, Folder: 6
Identifier: Folder 6
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Moultire District II school board minutes: 1961-1967

 File — Box: 39, Folder: 7
Identifier: Folder 7
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Moultrie District II school board minutes: 1974-1977

 File — Box: 39, Folder: 8
Identifier: Folder 8
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984