Skip to main content

Box 37

 Container

Contains 6 Results:

Correspondence and related documents

 File — Box: 37, Folder: 1-2
Identifier: Folder 1-2
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Exhibit index and deposition list

 File — Box: 37, Folder: 3
Identifier: Folder 3
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Plaintiff’s proposed post-trial finding of facts

 File — Box: 37, Folder: 4
Identifier: Folder 4
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Plaintiff-intervenors proposed conclusions of law

 File — Box: 37, Folder: 5
Identifier: Folder 5
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Testimony of Dr. Thomas Carrere

 File — Box: 37, Folder: 6
Identifier: Folder 6
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Deposition of Charles Gibson

 File — Box: 37, Folder: 7
Identifier: Folder 7
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984