Skip to main content

Box 36

 Container

Contains 9 Results:

Desegregation case deposition transcripts

 File — Box: 36, Folder: 1
Identifier: Folder 1
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Bills to undo act 340

 File — Box: 36, Folder: 2
Identifier: Folder 2
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Charleston City vote information 1966-1968

 File — Box: 36, Folder: 3
Identifier: Folder 3
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Draft Report to Charleston District #20

 File — Box: 36, Folder: 4
Identifier: Folder 4
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Charleston City Administrative School Survey 1966

 File — Box: 36, Folder: 5
Identifier: Folder 5
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Act 340 Journal of the House and Journal of the Senate

 File — Box: 36, Folder: 6
Identifier: Folder 6
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

South Carolina 379

 File — Box: 36, Folder: 7
Identifier: Folder 7
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Newspaper Articles

 File — Box: 36, Folder: 8
Identifier: Folder 8
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984

Exhibits

 File — Box: 36, Folder: 9
Identifier: Folder 9
Scope and Contents From the Series:

Suit filed in Charleston, South Carolina District Court. In this school desegregation case, plaintiffs (Ganaway et al. on behalf of all black children in Charleston) argue that schools in Charleston County continue to segregate in spite of legal orders to desegregate. Defendants argue that Charleston County school district was in fact desegregated according to the law.

Dates: 1953 - 1984